India vs Pakistan: The Water War Brewing Over the Indus Waters Treaty
Introduction In South Asia, where history is steeped in conflict, the enduring rivalry between India and Pakistan has shifted from bullets to a far more essential battleground: water. The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), once a paragon of diplomatic resilience, now teeters on the edge of collapse. Originally hailed for surviving three wars, the treaty is being tested by both natural and man-made disruptions. As both countries grapple with climate change, population pressure, and geopolitical friction, water has transformed into a weapon and a strategic asset. The question now looming over the subcontinent: Will water spark the next war between these nuclear-armed neighbors?
Breaking News: India-Pakistan Water Conflict Escalates After Indus Waters Treaty Suspension
The already fragile relationship between India and Pakistan has entered a critical new phase as India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), a historic agreement governing the sharing of the Indus River system’s waters. This unprecedented move came in the wake of a tragic terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu & Kashmir, where 26 civilians lost their lives on April 22, 2025. The attack was claimed by The Resistance Front (TRF), a proxy group linked to the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). India has accused Pakistan of harboring and supporting such cross-border terrorism, prompting the Indian government to take this bold step.
The suspension of the IWT marks a turning point in India-Pakistan relations. The treaty, signed in 1960 and brokered by the World Bank, had been one of the few areas of cooperation between the two countries despite multiple wars and ongoing political tension. It allocated water from six rivers of the Indus basin: the eastern rivers Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej were given to India, while Pakistan was granted rights over the western rivers Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab. This division helped maintain relative peace over water sharing for more than six decades.
Why the Treaty Matters
Water is a lifeline for both India and Pakistan, especially for their agricultural economies and millions of people dependent on irrigation and drinking water from the Indus basin. The Indus River system spans both countries, and managing its waters has been critical for their survival and economic development. The treaty was hailed globally as a rare example of successful conflict resolution, functioning effectively even during wars in 1965 and 1971.
However, the treaty’s endurance has always been fragile, held together by mutual interest and necessity rather than trust. Over the years, both nations have accused each other of violating the treaty’s provisions—India by building dams and hydroelectric projects on western rivers, and Pakistan by allegedly mismanaging water usage and infrastructure. But these disputes were largely resolved through treaty mechanisms, often involving neutral experts and international arbitration.
The Catalyst: Pahalgam Attack and Treaty Suspension
The attack in Pahalgam was a grim reminder of the unresolved conflict and terrorism that continues to plague the region. India’s response to suspend the IWT was unprecedented. For the first time since 1960, India halted its implementation of the treaty, stating that Pakistan’s continued support for terror groups made cooperation impossible. Prime Minister Narendra Modi explicitly linked the treaty’s suspension to the terrorism issue, saying India would reconsider the treaty only after Pakistan took concrete action against terrorist networks.
This bold stance sends a clear signal: India is willing to use water as a strategic tool in its geopolitical arsenal. The suspension also allows India greater freedom to maximize its usage of water from the eastern rivers and develop infrastructure without treaty constraints.
India’s Infrastructure Push
India has already made significant strides in developing water infrastructure projects in the region. The Shahpurkandi Dam project on the Ravi River in Punjab was completed in early 2024 and is designed to generate 206 MW of hydroelectric power and supply irrigation water to vast agricultural lands. This dam also prevents unutilized water from flowing into Pakistan, effectively reducing Pakistan’s water inflows.
Moreover, India is actively considering expanding the Ranbir Canal system to divert more water from the Chenab River, further restricting Pakistan’s share from the western rivers. While India maintains that these projects are fully compliant with the treaty and its right to use the eastern rivers, Pakistan views them as violations intended to weaken its water security.
Pakistan’s Response and International Outreach
Pakistan has strongly condemned India’s suspension of the treaty and infrastructure projects, warning that any further diversion of water from the Indus system would be viewed as an act of aggression. Pakistan’s Army Chief, General Asim Munir, emphasized that water is a "red line" for Pakistan and that the country would defend its basic rights.
Diplomatically, Pakistan has sought to internationalize the dispute. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif raised the issue at a climate conference in Tajikistan, appealing for global attention and mediation. Pakistan has also approached the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague to challenge India’s hydroelectric projects, claiming violations of treaty terms. However, India has rejected these legal challenges, insisting that the treaty’s dispute resolution mechanism involving neutral experts is the proper forum.
Domestic Pressures and Protests in Pakistan
Inside Pakistan, the water dispute has stirred significant unrest, especially in the Sindh province. The federal government’s plan to build six new canals as part of the Green Pakistan initiative led to widespread protests. Residents and civil society groups in Sindh accuse the federal authorities of planning to divert Sindh’s rightful share of the Indus waters, violating previous water-sharing accords within Pakistan itself.
The Babarloi Dharna protests in April 2025 saw lawyers, students, and activists blocking highways and staging sit-ins, underscoring the internal water governance challenges Pakistan faces. Critics argue that even with the treaty intact, Pakistan’s internal water mismanagement exacerbates scarcity and fuels discontent.
Climate Change: A Growing Threat
Beyond geopolitics, the Indus river basin faces mounting environmental challenges. The Himalayan glaciers feeding the Indus rivers are melting faster due to climate change, altering water flow patterns. Increased variability causes more frequent floods and droughts, threatening agriculture and water availability.
Population growth in both countries is pushing water demand higher, while inefficient agricultural practices consume vast quantities of water. The treaty, drafted over six decades ago, does not account for these modern challenges. Experts argue that the treaty needs urgent revision to incorporate climate adaptation, data sharing, and sustainable water management.
Risks of Escalation
The suspension of the IWT and increasing infrastructure development heighten the risk of conflict escalation. Water infrastructure like dams can become strategic targets in any future military confrontation. Even minor incidents, such as sabotage or uncoordinated releases of water, could trigger wider hostilities.
With both India and Pakistan being nuclear-armed states, the international community watches warily. Preventing a water-related conflict requires urgent diplomacy and trust-building. Yet India’s insistence on tying treaty talks to Pakistan’s counter-terrorism actions complicates dialogue.
The Road Ahead: Diplomacy and Cooperation
Despite the tense situation, diplomatic engagement remains the best hope for peace. Revamping the Indus Waters Treaty to address current realities—climate change, population pressures, technological advances—is essential. Joint river basin management, transparency in water data, and third-party monitoring could reduce mistrust.
Both countries must also pursue domestic reforms. India needs to improve water-use efficiency and reduce wastage, especially in agriculture. Pakistan must modernize its irrigation infrastructure and ensure equitable water distribution internally.
International mediators, including the World Bank and the United Nations, may need to facilitate renewed dialogue. Confidence-building measures can help lower tensions and prevent misunderstandings that could escalate to conflict.
Conclusion
The suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty marks a historic and worrying shift in India-Pakistan relations. What was once a shining example of cooperation is now a potential flashpoint for conflict in a region already fraught with tension. Water, an essential resource for millions on both sides, has become intertwined with issues of security, sovereignty, and survival.
As India and Pakistan navigate this complex crisis, the stakes could not be higher. Without urgent diplomacy and constructive engagement, the prospect of a "water war" looms, threatening regional stability and human livelihoods. The world must watch closely and support peaceful solutions to this unfolding water conflict, which carries implications far beyond South Asia.
0 Comments